a must-read blog of a simple college guy who dreaming big in life. his blog deals with talks about sports, entertainment, food, travel and his personal life. - It started as a hobby until it become part of his life.

SEARCH THIS BLOG!

Thursday, June 14, 2012

5 Judges to Re-score 'Pacquiao-Bradley' Fight, says WBO President



The World Boxing Organization (WBO) on Wednesday announced it has assigned five judges to re-score Manny Pacquiao's controversial loss by decision to Palm Springs' Timothy Bradley in an effort to convince state commissions to widen the pool of judges for major fights.

Although many at ringside for Saturday's fight gave Pacquiao between nine and 11 rounds, judges Duane Ford and C.J. Ross scored the bout 115-113 (seven rounds to five) in Bradley's favor, and a third Nevada judge, Jerry Roth, had it 115-113 for Pacquiao in the WBO welterweight title contest.

WBO President Francisco "Paco" Valcarcel said five judges, from New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Pennsylvania and Puerto Rico, will re-score the bout and submit their work confidentially to the WBO, with the scores to be gathered by Monday.

Valcarcel said that armed with that information, he will submit to the Assn. of Boxing Commissions by its July meeting a request that state commissions such as Nevada's work more diligently to bring in judges from outside their states for fights of the magnitude of a world title contest.


Before the Pacquiao-Bradley judges were assigned by the Nevada State Athletic Commission, Valcarcel said he submitted a list of 20 judges from elsewhere who could be assigned to the bout. None were chosen.

"We're asking the ABC to make recommendations how a sanctioning body like ours can work better with a state commission, to use this experience to have better scoring in the future," Valcarcel said.

Valcarcel said he is not considering stripping the WBO belt from Bradley, and will not order a mandatory rematch, because Pacquiao's contract stipulates he would get a rematch if he lost the bout. In promoting the fight, Bradley had printed up a poster and ticket hyping Bradley-Pacquiao II on Nov. 10.

"This wasn't Bradley's fault, and we're not saying there was any evidence of fraud or corruption here," Valcarcel said. "That's outside the scope of what we're doing."He said he's also not questioning the integrity of Ford or Ross.

"There are excellent judges available internationally, and they should be considered," Valcarcel said. "We've done it here in Puerto Rico, bringing in judges from Nevada."



SOURCE: bidakapamilya.blogspot.com



For More Personal Updates Follow Me on TWITTER or Like My Page on FACEBOOK
You Can Also CONTACT ME HERE.
...

Comments
3 Comments

3 comments:

  1. People still believe that anomaly and corruption have been made during that fight. I agree to have a rematch between Bradley and Pacquiao. Hope they would judge this clean and fair if ever they decided to have a rematch.

    Latest on Manny Pacquiao

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Breaking: WBO Review panels says Pacquiao should have won the fight vs Bradley. Pacquiao won by unanimous decision. BUT, WBO also say that the belt will stay to Bradley.

      READ HERE>>
      http://www.allanistheman.blogspot.com/2012/06/wbo-review-panel-pacquiao-won-by.html

      Delete
    2. Pacquiao really deserves to win. But I feel sorry for him that the belt will still remain to Bradley.

      Philippines Boxing News

      Delete

Your opinion is valuable. Share your thoughts. Ask and I Will Reply.

ShareThis